I don’t know, that’s a kind of pie in the sky kind of question, which I appreciate because you got me kind of stumped. But I’ve always been a scientist that liked to conduct experiments and you know, in that training course that we did in zoo biology, we were there to teach them western methods and practices in zoo biology and animal care. But I found in doing that, that I learned a lot by going to different countries and seeing what they did. And I learned things from them, even though they might not be accepted as in American practices, but they knew a lot of biology about the animals they kept. And I think that if you keep pushing the envelope and trying new things for specific purposes to improve the welfare of the critters in captivity or to explore even assisted reproduction in captivity or to understand lactation, I mean, if, if you, if you get the most out of the species in captivity, I think you’ll be doing a service to science and to society as a whole, rather than having a fixed sort of program where is formulaic and this is what we do and this is how we do it and it works and we’re not gonna change it because it ain’t broke. I would tend to take a more precautionary but experimental approach to trying new things where you feel that improvement is needed. But I think that’s the best I can do for that question right now.
