I think, well, there were two factors that were in play there. One, one was a, a very tight financial position. London had been losing, losing revenue for quite some time. There had been this relatively small injection, this 10 million pounds that I mentioned, but that was, felt that that was, it was more important to use that for running costs rather than any major new development. And so finances were a part of it. And in dealing with the financial position, we had to lay off quite a number of people. Of the roughly 500 members of staff in the two collections we had to lay off close to a hundred people. And as you can imagine that cause, and it was a, it was an absolute financial necessity.