I’d say some of it does. Some of it was directly for the field problems, like our study on tuberculosis in the buffalo in Kruger, we’d had some experience with tuberculosis problems in captive things, but they’re two different problems in a free-ranging versus a captive thing, so that didn’t directly feedback, but we used some of the testing in some of the philosophies in what we’d learned in both places. I think some of the biggest things was anesthesia, where we would have access to number of animals, I mean, on some field studies, I would go out and anesthetize 15 or 20 giraffes in a couple week period, where that would be impossible to do in a captive situation, where you don’t have that many, and we would get access to them, we monitor them, we could get blood samples, we collect sperm from ’em, you know, get a lot of good basic information from ’em. So that type of research was directly applicable to what we learned, and then we actually did some work with the feline immunodeficiency virus, the feline aids in lions, and looked at that in various populations of lions around.
