I think that’s a big philosophical question. Now, I know that it’s probably a balancing act and there are some institutions that might try to say, “Okay, we’ve got an operating budget but 10% of our operating budget, we’re going to identify for in situ conservation activities and that’s what we’re gonna do. That’s gonna be part of our program and we’ll identify what the projects are going to be. And 40% is going to go into new exhibits or 30% or whatever and whatever that amount of money is going to be, that’s what we’re gonna do it.” So, I don’t know. You should look at the dollar amount as much you should look at as the percentage of involvement that you’re doing. I think it’s very good if you can help make a difference in nature but I don’t feel that’s the primary purpose of the institution. It’s in addition to what they have to satisfy at home. We talked about expensive exhibits and right now, elephants being maintained in zoos is generally a hot topic.
