So I would say that then it’s justifiable to expend large sums in the tens of million. So for facilities in these urban institutions, if they can and do devote themselves to changing the, shall we say, the attitude, the behavior of these urban publics to the rest of the living world. So that’s a sort of double commitment. You just don’t build this for entertainment. You build it to communicate with your publics. And it’s important to communicate with those publics, because whatever form of governments there are around the world, those urban publics are what they’re catering to, and must, I mean, if they’re going to survive in any governmental form we know about. So it’s truly a challenging question you pose, but I think the institutions really have to reflect on what is this going to accomplish to put monies here rather than funding a particular effort in the wild. But there’s another problem is that the efforts in the wild are not so well organized and coordinated that they can be productive.
