I really hate to see that situation. The same thing exists with zoos and free ranging wild animals. There’s a conflict there ideologically and philosophically, but by the same token, they need to utilize what’s known in the captive situation to learn more about the wild situation and vice versa. Are you talking about game ranches or are you about animals and- No, the free ranging animals that are being studied or being handled. For many years, there was a conflict between wildlife veterinarians and zoo veterinarians. I think this is a false premise that there is a difference. The approach for free ranging wild animal medicine is an epidemiologic approach. The captive animals are individual animal medicine-oriented.