No, I think that, I think elephants, elephants were the first cause chip, chip, chip, chip, chip, killer whales were second, killer whales, probably with some good reason if you understand anything about where they came from and what happens to the group once they’re taken out of nature, it was a disingenuous public relations project to get killer whales away from the American public. I think that was self-serving in terms of some of the animal activists. And I think they took advantage of disgruntled former employees who had an axe to grind with Sea World and similar kinds of entities. And I, again, believe that that is, that’s a tragedy. We will probably for the next 50 or 60 years have killer whales in captivity simply by the nature of how long they live, but to agree to stop propagating them, to agree to cheapen their exhibition by agreeing to not provide the animals with the kind of enhancement and enrichment that they had in the past with their interaction with their keepers, I think that also is an American tragedy. I understand from Sea World standpoint, from the corporate standpoint, I understand why they made the concessions that they made because it clearly, the company was on its way, essentially out of business because of the efforts of the animal rights activists. And this is a in-between step. This is a step they’ve taken to really gain some of the confidence of the visiting public.
