Now these are the ones that are thinking clearly there’s obviously not gonna be, it never is going. The, the realism is that you are never going to move 5 million bucks from one exhibit into field exhibit. There’s, there’s recently a report come out done by born free of cats, big cat keeping in the uk it’s come out literally this week. And what it’s saying is, it’s actually, what it’s done is it’s picked up on the, the cost of some of the big cat exhibits in, in UK zoos and, you know, three, four, 5 million pounds and said, well, white, you know, that would’ve paid for three years of our work with such and such. But it’s totally unrealistic now to say that, can we, can we work with you where we provide a proportion of that funding into the field, then that, that is realistic. Now there’s another argument too, as to why the exhibit may actually be more effective in conservation than putting that money into the field. If you have a really good exhibit built and interpreted in the ways that we’ve been talking about, and you’ve got a million visitors a year, you may no proof be a very interesting test, you may actually be influencing more people about the needs for global conservation with that exhibit, then you are going to save one particular environment with, with probably what is a relatively small money in terms of what’s needed in the field. So you could argue that a really and built exhibit, designed exhibit actually has greater conservation value than pumping that same sum of money into into field activities.
