(George chuckling) Well, the person on the, Blakely was on the animal side, responsible for the collections, et cetera. And the other gentleman who occupied that post was responsible for for the public accommodations and the restaurants and so on, and so forth. And there was sort of constant tension in respect to, what received the most attention and the trustees decided that it simply wasn’t workable, the conflicts in terms of the demands for greater investment on the public services side versus the welfare of the animal collection. So that’s why they decided to discontinue that arrangement. And at the beginning, there were actually four of us involved at the directorial level, but that was soon abolished within a year, but it certainly wasn’t workable in the circumstance. Nowadays I think that it’s more apt to result in say a CEO, COO situation where there’s a chief operating officer, but then a chief executive officer is looking for the outside world and the relationships they’re in. So that’s something we might take up later. But at the time, the co-director simply was a matter of the divergent interest of the two parties.
