I think that concept has excellent potential and it should be done. We tried to sort of pin a 10% number on and it wasn’t cast in stone, but our animal committee decided that would be a reasonable number to consider when we build an exhibit to try and allocate that. And it wouldn’t necessarily have to be to in-situ conservation. It could be to research, to discover better diets, to discover better medical treatments. It could be to pay for relocations between institutions, to pay for animal moves, to enhance breeding any number of things. But as long as it was to enhance conservation in general.
